Could perverse incentives undermine biodiversity offset policies?

We’ve just had a published in Journal of Applied Ecology that examines potential perverse incentives resulting from biodiversity offsetting. We outline some of the ways in which even best-practice offsetting could end up being bad for biodiversity, and discuss how to reduce the risks of perverse outcomes.

The paper is available here: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2664.12398/abstract

Share this post:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

A photo of a Crimson Rosella (Platycercus elegans), a medium-sized red parrot with distinctive blue cheek patches. Crimson Rosellas typically inhabit forests and woodlands, including in urban areas. In this photo, a single Crimson Rosella is sitting in the branches of a Eucalyptus (gum) tree. The bird is looking at the camera, with its had turned slightly towards the left. Its bright crimson colouring boldly stands out against the sage green of the gum leaves that surround its perching site.

Bringing Woodland Birds Back

Last week, the ICON Science team received news that our ARC Industry Linkage Project, “Bringing woodland birds back to the suburbs,” has been funded in