Integrating biodiversity as a non-human stakeholder within urban development.
Cris Hernandez
“Greater focus on the need of the people who use cities must be a key goal for the future”
Jan Gehl [1, p6].
This quote from Jan Gehl, one of the most influential urban thinkers of the last 50 years, is a criticism to planning strategies that favour transport and human mobility while disregarding the ‘place’ experience of urban citizens. The quote appears in his book “Cities for People” where he asks designers to work at a human-scale and to design for human experiences… But are cities for people?
The problem with this phrasing lies in what is implied: cities are [just] for people. It implies that humans are the only living being with a right to the city. It ignores the ‘other’ dwellers of our cities: animals, plants, natural processes and habitats – the non-human.
Non-human urban dwellers are also entities we share cities with. They have their own agency and play and active role in shaping our cities into what they are. As such, they are also end-users that built environment professionals should design for.
Recognising non-human urban dwellers
In urbanism and design, nature is often viewed and valued for its critical role enhancing human experiences. Trees and parks are important features that deliver more enjoyable urban experiences. Unfortunately, this view frames nature, and all the different non-humans, as a commodity that is here to provide us, humans, with a service. It is here for humans to enjoy, manage and control.
This framing also disregards biodiversity’s role as a stakeholder.
Our paper, published recently in Landscape and Urban Planning, explores potential roles that designers consciously or unconsciously assign to biodiversity [2]. Inspired by grammatical terms of ‘passive’ and ‘active’ voice, we identified three roles that built environment professionals assign to biodiversity and draw a parallel between these roles and the participatory ladder.
Participatory Continuum for non-humans, it shows the parallel between the participatory ladder (by Arnstein 1969) and the passive, incidental and active roles designers’ assign to biodiversity. Image sourced from Hernandez-Santin et al 2023.
The journey to design for biodiversity starts by recognising the three potential roles assigned to biodiversity. Then, we can aim to design processes that are inclusive to biodiversity by taking critical action to integrate biodiversity’s views as an active stakeholder.
Specifically, we suggest that designers should:
“Greater focus on the need of the people who use cities must be a key goal for the future” Jan Gehl [1, p6].
Reframe species, natural processes, and habitats as ‘non-human users of place’.
Treat ‘non-human users’ as relevant stakeholders to design for.
Articulate the needs and priorities for ‘non-human users’.
Aim to include ‘non-human users’ as active stakeholders by explicitly considering biodiversity’s needs within the design process.
We are currently seeking expressions of interest for the following PhD project. About the position Location: Parkville campus Employment Type: Full-time Duration: 3.5 years fixed-term
Last week, the ICON Science team received news that our ARC Industry Linkage Project, “Bringing woodland birds back to the suburbs,” has been funded in
After years of championing Biodiversity Sensitive Urban Design (BSUD) in new housing developments, the ICON Science team finally had the opportunity to visit a project
From Sunday 23 to Friday 28 November 2025, ecologists from across Australia gathered in Adelaide on Kaurna Country for the annual Ecological Society of Australia (ESA) Conference.
